Trauma · 7 November 2026 · 5 min read

Why recognising neurodiversity and different forms of trauma matters more than ever

No two brains are alike – and no two traumas are alike. Why neurodiversity, the different forms of trauma and different paths to healing belong together.

Why recognising neurodiversity and different forms of trauma matters more than ever

People differ neurobiologically. This is well established by research[1],[2]. The technical term for it is neurodiversity: the diversity of all brains. There is no such thing as a “normal”, neurotypical brain. Neurotypical is a statistical construct, and hardly anyone matches it completely in every area[3],[4],[5]. Difference is not the exception, it is the rule.

Neurodiversity shows up especially clearly in autism, ADHD, dyslexia or high sensitivity[2],[6]. They make visible how differently our brains process information and stimuli.

These traits are not simply present or absent. They are distributed along a spectrum[2]. A spectrum can be compared to a temperature scale: –10 degrees is cold, +40 degrees is warm. There is no objective line at which it becomes “warm” or “cold”. The same goes for “loud” and “quiet”.

Neurodiversity works in exactly the same way. A great many people carry such traits within them, such as autistic or ADHD traits that don’t always reach the threshold for a diagnosis. These characteristics bring challenges and weaknesses in everyday life. But they also bring special abilities. I call this neurodiversity potential. Current research allows only one conclusion: we all perceive differently, and we all function differently.

Different forms of trauma

This is exactly the insight we need to apply to trauma. People process traumatic experiences differently, partly because there are fundamentally different forms of trauma:

These differences lead to completely different therapeutic needs. Your own path to healing cannot simply be taken as a template for how other people heal.

When insight alone is not enough

The experiences of people with complex trauma in particular are fundamentally different from everyday stress or a one-off strain[8],[10]. Insight alone is not enough to resolve these traumas[16],[17]. Those affected are, in the truest sense of the word, trapped in their feelings and nervous system responses[16].

A person with complex trauma can be standing in the street, their mind knowing with 100 percent certainty that there is no real danger. Yet when the trauma is activated, they still feel as if their life were in acute danger[16],[17]. The threat response runs largely automatically, deep in the body, and logical reasoning can barely stop it[17],[18]. Real healing and real support only begin where we understand and acknowledge these differences.

That is why we must not leave people with trauma on their own. The attitude “everyone is responsible for themselves” falls short here. These people need our support, because they can be trapped in their feelings.

Sources

  1. Armstrong, T. (2010). The Power of Neurodiversity. Da Capo Lifelong Books.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.).
  3. Constantino, J. N. & Todd, R. D. (2003). Autistic traits in the general population: A twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(5), 524–530. doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524
  4. Daniels, G. S. (1952). The “Average Man”? Technical Note WCRD 53-7. Wright Air Development Center, U.S. Air Force.
  5. Caspi, A. et al. (2020). Longitudinal assessment of mental health disorders and comorbidities across 4 decades among participants in the Dunedin Birth Cohort Study. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e203221. doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3221
  6. Aron, E. N. & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
  7. Terr, L. C. (1991). Childhood traumas: An outline and overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(1), 10–20. doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.1.10
  8. World Health Organization (2019). ICD-11, 6B40 PTSD / 6B41 Complex PTSD. icd.who.int/
  9. Cloitre, M. et al. (2013). Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD: A latent profile analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1). doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20706
  10. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.
  11. van der Kolk, B. A. (2005). Developmental trauma disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), 401–408. doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20050501-06
  12. Figley, C. R. (1995). Compassion Fatigue. Brunner/Mazel.
  13. Danieli, Y. (Ed.) (1998). International Handbook of Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma. Plenum Press.
  14. Yehuda, R. et al. (2016). Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation. Biological Psychiatry, 80(5), 372–380. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005
  15. Hirschberger, G. (2018). Collective trauma and the social construction of meaning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1441. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01441
  16. van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Viking.
  17. Ehlers, A. & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319–345. doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00123-0
  18. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. Simon & Schuster.

Editorial team: STUDIO B · Last updated: 7 November 2026

Want to go deeper?
Free in the community.

Go to the Trauma Course →
Book a session → 5,0 ★★★★★ · 20 reviews